The Mediating Role of Religiosity on the Big Five Personalities and Marital Satisfaction in Indonesia: A Perspective of Da'wah Psychology

Authors

  • Bukhari Bukhari Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang, Indonesia
  • Shovia Lintina Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Sabiruddin Sabiruddin Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang, Indonesia
  • Mistarija Mistarija Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang, Indonesia
  • A’dawiyah Ismail University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Septin Maisharah K Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Muhammadiyah Bojonegoro, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25217/0020236369600

Keywords:

da'wah psychology, marital satisfaction, mediation, personality, religiosity

Abstract

Personality and religiosity have been found to be the most important predictors of marital satisfaction in empirical studies. However, there has not yet been any research that examines the causal relationship between personality and religiosity and the impact of both on marital satisfaction in the same model, from the perspective of da'wah psychology. In the current study, we aimed to verify the relationship between personality and marital satisfaction is mediated by religiosity, as it is perceived as motivation from the perspective da’wah of psychology. This research uses a quantitative approach, and statistical analysis methods in path analysis research using Mplus software version 8.0. The sample consisted of 347 participants. The results show that 1) Personality type affects marital satisfaction mediated by religiosity fit with data significantly and negatively and 2) Negative personality emotionality affects marital satisfaction both directly and through religiosity as a mediator variable, where religiosity is as a partial mediator. The perspective of da'wah psychology is an approach that integrates religious principles with psychological knowledge so that it can provide a deeper understanding of helping individuals develop their potential and improve the quality of their lives and provide a framework for understanding the role of religiosity by emphasizing the importance of applying religious values in shaping marital satisfaction. The implications of this study highlight the importance of religiosity as a mediator in overcoming problems and suppressing negative emotionality so as to increase marital satisfaction in each couple within the framework of da'wah psychology.

References

Ahya, A., & Siaputra, I. B. (2021). Validasi Big Five Inventory-2 (BFI-2) untuk Indonesia: Belum sempurna tetapi valid dan reliabel mengukur kepribadian. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat, 2. https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu458

Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2000). Research on the Nature and Determinants of Marital Satisfaction: A Decade in Review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(4), 964–980. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00964.x

Chehreh, H., Ozgoli, G., Abolmaali, K., & Nasiri, M. (2017). The relationship between personality traits and marital satisfaction based on five factors model of personality: A systematic review. ,. Scientific Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, 22(5), 121–132. Google Scholar

Choong, K. F., Ong, F. S., & Moschis, G. P. (2013). Materialism and well-being: The moderating effects of religiosity on young Malaysian consumers. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 34(2), 178–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2013.801693

Chukwuorji, J. B. C., Ituma, E. A., & Ugwu, L. E. (2018). Locus of Control and Academic Engagement: Mediating Role of Religious Commitment. Current Psychology, 37(4), 792–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9546-8

Claxton, A., O’rourke, N., Smith, J. Z., Delongis, A., & Rourke, N. O. ’. (2012). Personality traits and marital satisfaction within enduring relationships: An intra-couple discrepancy approach. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29(3), 375–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407511431183

Clobert, M., & Saroglou, V. (2015). Religion , Paranormal Beliefs , and Distrust in Science : Comparing East Versus West. 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1163/15736121-12341302

Cozby, P. L., & Bates, S. C. (2011). Methods In Behavioral Research (12th ed.). Mc Graw Hill.

Dudley, M. G., A., K. F., & Jr. (1990). Religiosity and Marital Satisfaction: A Research Note. Review of Religious Research, 32(1), 78–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-006-9020-0

Entringer, T. M., Gebauer, J. E., Eck, J., Bleidorn, W., Rentfrow, P. J., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2021). Big Five Facets and Religiosity: Three Large-Scale, Cross-Cultural, Theory-Driven, and Process-Attentive Tests. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(6), 1662–1695. https://doi.org/10.1037/PSPP0000364

Fairchild, A. J., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). A General Model for Testing Mediation and Moderation Effects. Prevention Science 2008 10:2, 10(2), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11121-008-0109-6

Feist, J., & Feist, G., J. (2021). Theories o f Personality. Mc Graw Hill. Google Scholar

Fowers, B. J., & Olson, D. H. (1993). ENRICH Marital Satisfaction Scale: A Brief Research and Clinical Tool. Journal of Family Psychology, 7(2), 176–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.7.2.176

Hadikusuma, H. H. (1990). Hukum perkawinan Indonesia menurut: Perundangan hukum adat, hukum agama. Mandar Maju. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=2209

Hasbiyallah, & Sulhan, M. (2019). Hadits Tarbawi dan Hadits-Hadits di Sekolah dan Madrasah [UIN Sunan Gunung Djati]. In Penelitian Hadis. Google Scholar

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Hurlock, E. (1996). Psikologi Perkembangan: Suatu Kehidupan Sepanjang Rentang Kehidupan (5th ed.). Erlangga. Google Scholar

Idris, S., Mohd Jailani, M. R., Mahyuddin, M. K., & Ab. Rahman, O. (2021). Psychology of Da’wah Impact on Balanced Personality Among Private Young Adult Higher University in Malaysia. ‘Abqari Journal, 25(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.33102/abqari.vol24no2.252

Iffah, A. S. (2018). Pengaruh religiusitas terhadap kepuasan pernikahan para istri di Desa Sumurber Panceng Gresik. Google Scholar

Indriani, R. (2014). Pengaruh kepribadian terhadap kepuasan perkawinan wanita dewasa awal pada fase awal perkawinan ditinjau dari teori trait kepribadian big five. Jurnal Psikologi Klinis Dan Kesehatan Mental, 3(1), 33–39. Google Scholar

Javanmard, G. H., & Garegozlo, R. M. (2013). The Study of Relationship Between Marital Satisfaction and Personality Characteristics In Iranian Families. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 396–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.573

Kaufman, A. (2011). Personality, Partner Similarity and Couple Satisfaction: Do Opposites Attract or Birds of a Feather Flock Together? Google Scholar

Khoshdast, F. A., Jalali, M. R., & Kakavand, R., A. (2016). Relationship between the personality traits, defense mechanisms and marital satisfaction of elementary school students‟ parents. IIOAB Journal, 7(10), 31–37. Google Scholar

Kohari, K., Majid, Z. A., Abdullah, F., & Adnan, M. (2022). the Role and Function of Preacher in the Psychological Dakwah Perspective. Al-Risalah, 13(2), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.34005/alrisalah.v13i1.1915

Madanian, L., & Mansor, S. M. S. S. (2013). Marital Satisfaction and Demographic Traits in an Emigrant Sample: Rasch Analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 107, 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.404

Maltby, J., Day, L., & Macaskill, A. (2010). Personality, Individual Differences and Intelligence. Pearson Education. Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R. (1999). Mainstream Personality Psychology and the Study of Religion. Journal of Personality, 67(6), 1209–1218. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00088

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1996). Toward a New Generation of Personality Theories: Theoretical Contexts for the Five-Factor Model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The Five-Factor Model of Personality: Theoretical Perspectives (Issue January 1996). Guilford Press. Google Scholar

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural equation modeling (9.4 ed.). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0904_8

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus: Statistical Analysis with Latent Variables: User’s Guide (Version 8) (Version 8). CA: Authors. Google Scholar

Najarpourian, S., Fatehizadeh, M., Etemadi, O., Ghasemi, V., Abedi, M. R., & Bahrami, F. (2012). Personality Types and Marital Satisfaction. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 372–383. Google Scholar

Nihayah, Z., Adriani, Y., & Wahyuni, Z. I. (2013). Peran religiusitas dan faktor-faktor psikologis terhadap kepuasan pernikahan. Annual International Conference on Islamic Studies (AICIS XII), 937–964. Google Scholar

Olson, D. H., Defrain, J., & Skogrand, L. (2014). Marriages and Families Intimacy, Diversity, and Strengths Chapter 2 Cultural Diversity and Diversity in Family Structure: Family Strengths and Challenges. McGraw Hill Education. Google Scholar

Olufadi, Y. (2017). Muslim Daily Religiosity Assessment Scale (MUDRAS): A new instrument for Muslim religiosity research and practice. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 9(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1037/REL0000074

Rubino, R. (2020). Mengatasi Pecandu Narkoba (Pendekatan Psikologi Dakwah). An Nadwah, 25(2), 119. https://doi.org/10.37064/nadwah.v25i2.7491

Samani, L. N., Jafari, F., Abolwasemi, J., Avani, S. T., & Fatemi, N. S. (2016). Marital Satisfaction and Character. International Journal of Biology, Pharmacy and Allied Sciences (IJBPAS), 5(4), 907–918. Google Scholar

Santrock, J. (1995). Life Span Development (5th ed.). Erlangga. Google Scholar

Saroglou, V., & Muñoz-garcía, A. (2008). Individual differences in religion and spirituality: An issue of personality traits and/or values. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 47(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2008.00393.x

Sauma, M. S. (2018). Psikologi Dakwah Qur’an ( Sebuah Kajian Analisis Ontologi, Epistemologi dan Aksiologi ). An-Nida’ : Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Penyiaran Islam, 7(1), 63–77. Google Scholar

Schnell, T. (2012). Spirituality with and without Religion — Differential. 34, 33–61. https://doi.org/10.1163/157361212X644495

Sham, F. M., & Nazim, A. M. (2015). Pendekatan Psikologi Dakwah Dalam Menangani Remaja Berisiko: Fokus Pendekatan Bimbingan Jiwa. Hadhari, 7(2), 63–73. Google Scholar

Shahmoradi, H., Masjedi-Arani, A., Bakhtiari, M., & Abasi, I. (2021). Investigating the role of childhood trauma, emotion dysregulation, and self-criticism in predicting self-harming behaviors. Practice in Clinical Psychology9(4), 321-328. Google Scholar

Stage, F. K., Carter, H. C., & Nora, A. (2004). Path analysis: An introduction and analysis of a decade of research. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.1.5-13

Sullivan, K. T. (2001). Understanding the relationship between religiosity and marriage: An investigation of the immediate and longitudinal effects of religiosity on newlywed couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 15(4), 610–626. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.15.4.610

Suminta, R. R. (2016). Hubungan Antara Tipe Kepribadian Dengan Orientasi Religiusitas. Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah Dan Studi Keagamaan, 4(2), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.21043/fikrah.v4i2.1884

Suryadi, B., & Hayat, B. (2021). Religiusitas: Konsep, Pengukuran, dan Implementasi di Indonesia. In Bibliosmia Karya Indonesia. Google Scholar

Szcześniak, M., Sopińska, B., & Kroplewski, Z. (2019). Big five personality traits and life satisfaction: The mediating role of religiosity. Religions, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10070437

Townsend, J. D., Montoya, M. M., & Calantone, R. J. (2011). Form and Function: A Matter of Perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(3), 374–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00804.x

Trinh, L. T., & Phan, H. T. (2020). Preliminary Development of the Vietnamese Marital Satisfaction Scale (MSS-VN): a pilot study using a Vietnamese. Health Psychology Report, 8(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr.2019.86701

Umar, J., & Nisa, Y. F. (2020). Uji Validitas Konstruk dengan CFA dan Pelaporannya. Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi Dan Pendidikan Indonesia (JP3I), 9(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v9i2.16964

Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2020). Structural Equation Modeling. In Wiley (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Son L.td. Google Scholar

Wink, P., Ciciolla, L., Dillon, M., & Tracy, A. (2007). Religiousness , Spiritual Seeking , and Personality : Findings from a Longitudinal Study. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00466.x

Zaheri, F., Dolatian, M., Shariati, M., Simbar, M., Ebadi, A., & Hasanpoor Azghadi, S. B. (2016). Effective Factors in Marital Satisfaction in Perspective of Iranian Women and Men: A systematic review. Electronic Physician, 8(12), 3369–3377. https://doi.org/10.19082/3369

Downloads

Published

2023-06-28

How to Cite

Bukhari, B., Lintina, S., Sabiruddin, S., Mistarija, M., Ismail, A., & Maisharah K, S. (2023). The Mediating Role of Religiosity on the Big Five Personalities and Marital Satisfaction in Indonesia: A Perspective of Da’wah Psychology. Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.25217/0020236369600