Development of an Islamic Temporal Focus Scale: Factorial Analysis, Validity, and Reliability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25217/0020247442900Keywords:
factorial, Islamic temporal focus scale, validityAbstract
This study aimed to collect the largest possible number of items from the Islamic literature. The validity of these items was verified by a sample of experts and academics (N=21). Through in-depth interviews using Delphi procedures, 59 items were derived as an initial list for the scale. After several statistical analyses, including EFA and CFA, they were reduced to 32 items. The results of EFA (N=369) showed three main factors for Islamic Temporal Focus Scale (ITFS) extraction with a sum of squared loading of 64.51%. For the third sample (N=439), which was used for CFA, three factors confirmed the convergent validity of this scale, which is related to the Arab Scale of Happiness, the Measure of Reverence in Muslim Prayer, and the DASS-21, including the factors of depression, anxiety, and psychological stress. The results showed that the reliability values were stable. The values of Cronbach’s alpha were 0.780 for the past factor, 0.920 for the present factor, and 0.810 for the future factor. With regard to the split-half reliability of each of the three factors, the results showed that the stability coefficient was 0.820 for the past factor, 0.890 for the present factor, and 0.750 for the future factor. Therefore, the ITFS provides suitable evaluation and integration with past, present, or future factors. It has health and psychological implications and scientific value for future studies that can link it to variables such as mindfulness as well as psychological and physical disorders.
References
Abdel-Khalek, A. M. (2013). The Arabic Scale of Happiness (ASH): Psychometric Characteristics. Comprehensive Psychology, 2. https://doi.org/10.2466/02.09.CP.2.5
Aldahadha, B. (2018). The psychometric properties of perfectionism scale and its relation to depression and anxiety. Cogent Psychology, 5(1), 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2018.1524324
Aldahadha, B. (2019). Repeated negative thinking as a mediator of refraining from catastrophic thinking and neurotic responses. Psychiatry Psychotherapy and Clinical Psychology., 10(2), 181–240. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85069946104&partnerID=40&md5=79227d0bf74cb666c964d96f6d188d0f
Aldahadha B. (2023). Developing a Jordanian Measure of Reverence in Muslim Praying ('Khushoo'): Content Validity, Factor Structure and Reliability. Journal of religion and health, 62(5), 3664–3686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-023-01801-y
Aldahadha, B. (2021). Metacognition, mindfulness attention awareness, and their relationships with depression and anxiety. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 39(2), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-020-00367-y
Ali, A. M., Ahmed, A., Sharaf, A., Kawakami, N., Abdeldayem, S. M., & Green, J. (2017). The Arabic Version of The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21: Cumulative scaling and discriminant-validation testing. Asian journal of psychiatry, 30, 56–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2017.07.018
Arslan, Ü. & Bayraktar, B. (2021). Focusing on the Past, Present, and Future: Psychometric Properties of the Temporal Focus Scale in Turkish Culture. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (52), 44-57. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.812331
Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822
Chishima, Y., McKay, M. T., & Murakami, T. (2017). The reliability and validity of the Temporal Focus Scale in young Japanese adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.07.031
Chishima, Y., McKay, M., & Cole, J. (2017). The generalizability of temporal focus profiles across cultures: A secondary analysis using data from Japan and the United Kingdom. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 92–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid. 2017.02.011
Cole, P. & Reese, D. (2018) New Directions in Gestalt Group Therapy: Relational Ground, Authentic Self. NYC, NY: Routledge: Taylor and Francis Group. https://www.routledge.com/New-Directions-in-Gestalt-Group-Therapy-Relational-Ground-Authentic-Self/Cole-Reese/p/book/9781138948624
Cole, P. (2022). The Relational Heart of Gestalt Therapy: Contemporary Perspectives. eBook: Routledge, https://www.routledge.com/The-Relational-Heart-of-Gestalt-Therapy-Contemporary-Perspectives/Cole/p/book/9781032186917
Diaconu-Gherasim, L. R., & Mardari, C. R. (2021). Personality traits and time perspectives: Implications for adolescents’ mental health and mental illness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 23(1), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-021-00390-5
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
Fagin, J. & Shepherd, I. (1970) Gestalt Therapy Now. Harper, New York
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
Holman, E. A., & Silver, R. C. (1998). Getting "stuck" in the past: temporal orientation and coping with trauma. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74(5), 1146–1163. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.74.5.1146
Ihloff, R.W. (1976). Suffering to grow. Journal of Religion and Health 15, 164–180.
https://regweb.mutah.edu.jo:2107/10.1007/BF01534233
Koenig, H. G., & Al Zaben, F. (2020). Psychometric validation and translation of religious and spiritual measures. Journal of Religion and Health, 60, 3467–3483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01373-9
McKenna H. P. (1994). The Delphi technique: a worthwhile research approach for nursing?. Journal of advanced nursing, 19(6), 1221–1225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01207.x
Li, X., & Lyu, H. (2021). Epidemic risk perception, perceived stress, and mental health during COVID-19 pandemic: A moderated mediating model. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 563741– 563741. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.563741
Li, J., Dou, K., & Liang, Y. (2021). The relationship between presence of meaning, search for meaning, and subjective wellbeing: A three-level meta-analysis based on the meaning in life questionnaire. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(1), 467– 489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00230-y
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
McKay, M. T., Cole, J. C., & Percy, A. (2017). Temporal focus clusters differ meaningfully in terms of anxiety and depressive symptomatology. Psychiatry Research, 256, 283–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.06.061
McKay, M. T., Percy, A., Goudie, A. J., Sumnall, H. R., & Cole, J. C. (2012). The Temporal Focus Scale: Factor structure and association with alcohol use in a sample of Northern Irish school children. Journal of Adolescence, 35(5), 1361–1368. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.adolescence.2012.05.006.
Mello, Z. R., Barber, S. J., Vasilenko, S. A., Chandler, J., & Howell, R. (2022). Thinking about the past, present, and future: Time perspective and self-esteem in adolescents, young adults, middle-aged adults, and older adults. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 40(1), 92–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12393
Moreira-Almeida, A., & Hood, R. W., Jr (2023). Methodological Exclusion of the Transcendent? Implications for Theory and Research in Religion, Spirituality and Health. Journal of religion and health, 10.1007/s10943-023-01896-3. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-023-01896-3
Nan, X., & Qin, Y. (2018). How thinking about the future affects
our decisions in the present: Effects of time orientation and episodic future thinking on responses to health warning messages. Human Communication Research, 45(2), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqy017
Rayan, A., & Ahmad, M. (2018). The psychometric properties of the mindful attention awareness scale among Arab parents of children with autism spectrum disorder. Archives of psychiatric nursing, 32(3), 444–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2018.01.001
Rush, J., & Grouzet, F. M. E. (2012). It is about time: Daily relationships between temporal perspective and well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(5), 427–442. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2012.713504.
Sahih al-Bukhari (M. Muhsin Khan, Trans.). (1997). Sahih al-Bukhari: The Translation of the Meanings. Darussalam. (Original work published ca. 846 C.E.). https://sunnah.com/bukhari
Shipp, A. J., & Aeon, B. (2019). Temporal focus: Thinking about the past, present, and future. Current Opinion in Psychology, 26, 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.04.005
Shipp, A. J., Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2009). Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: Thfe subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.05.001.
Stewart, R. D. (1974). The philosophical background of Gestalt therapy. The Counseling Psychologist, 4(4), 13–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/001100007400400406
Stolarski, M., Zajenkowski, M., Jankowski, K. S., & Szymaniak, K. (2020). Deviation from the balanced time perspective: A systematic review of empirical relationships with psychological variables. Personality and Individual Differences, 156, 109772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid. 2019.109772
Strobel, M., Tumasjan, A., Spörrle, M., & Welpe, I. M. (2013). The future starts today, not tomorrow: How future focus promotes organizational citizenship behaviors. Human Relations, 66(6), 829–856. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018726712470709.
Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. C. (2007). The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(3), 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07001975
Umm Kulthum (2023, August 31). I will meet you tomorrow. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOn8vkJewsg
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
Wilber, K. (2000). Integral psychology: Consciousness, spirit, psychology, therapy. Boston: Shambhala.
World Health Organization (2022). World mental health report: Transforming mental health for all.
Yontef, G., & Fairfield, M. (2008). Gestalt therapy. In K. Jordan (Ed.), The quick theory reference guide: A resource for expert and novice mental health professionals (pp. 83–106). Nova Science Publishers. https://www.google.jo/books/edition/The_Quick_Theory_Reference_Guide/fs-qN3TOmSUC?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PP1&printsec=frontcover
Zacher, H. (2016). Within-person relationships between daily individual and job characteristics and daily manifestations of career adaptability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.11.013
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271–1288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Basim Aldahadha, Mohammad Al Dwakat

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.