Religious Moderation Among Generation Z Indonesian Muslims: A Dialectical Analysis of Understanding and Practice

Authors

  • Prabowo Adi Widayat Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro, Indonesia
  • Cahaya Khaeroni Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro, Indonesia
  • Kuliyatun Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25217/jf.v10i1.5726

Keywords:

Generation Z, Islamic Narrative, Relational Dogmatism, Religious Moderation

Abstract

This article examines the narrative patterns of the Islamic Generation Z in Metro, Indonesia, with a focus on the interplay between understanding and the practice of religious moderation. The discussion is motivated by the significant influence of Islamic discourse in both the virtual and real lives of this generation. This influence is evident in the diverse Islamic studies disseminated by individuals from this demographic, as well as by scholars, ustāż, ulema, and kiai, through pengajian ‘religious gatherings’ and various digital Islamic platforms such as www.muhamamdiyah.or.id, NU Online, Islam Digest on Republika Online, www.muslim.or.id, islami.co, YouTube, and others. This Islamic discourse functions as a barometer for Generation Z Muslims, guiding them in the proper and proportional practice of their faith in everyday life. To foster a robust understanding of Islam, Generation Z requires a framework that considers their level of comprehension and the ease of practice. In reality, they often face challenges in sifting through the diverse information available to them, making it difficult to use it as a reliable guideline for their actions, speech, and thoughts. The findings presented in this article stem from field research utilizing a single instrumental case study approach. Data collection methods included non-participant observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation, with analysis conducted at various stages of the research process. The results reveal two distinct types of Islamic narratives among Generation Z. The first is the functional dialectical narrative, which is grounded in logical, empirical, and methodological scientific studies and is effectively applicable in religious and social interactions within a pluralistic society. The second type is relational dogmatism, characterized by a religious narrative rooted in binding and fundamental textual arguments (fiqhiyyah-muqayyadah). This narrative serves as a singular guideline for spiritual and social interactions in a pluralistic context.

References

Adinugraha, H. H., Din, M. U., & Muhtarom, A. (2021). The Spirituality of Rural Muslim Communities through Jam’iyyah Nahdlatul Ulama Routine Activities. Prosperity: Journal of Society and Empowerment, 1(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21580/prosperity.2021.1.1.7896

Ahmad, H. (2023). Mapping Neo-Modern and Postmodern Qur’ānic Reformist Discourse in the Intellectual Legacy of Fazlur Rahman and Mohammed Arkoun. Religions, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14050595

Ahyar, M. (2018). Meretas Tradisi Monolitik dalam Kajian Islam/Hukum Islam. Mazahib, 17(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v17i2.1404

Alhattab, S., & Bin Jamil, K. H. (2024). The Landscape of the Interplay Between Religion and Science_ The Experience of Islamic Discourse. International Journal Of Religion, 5(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.61707/ybg86c06

Ali, J. A. (2023). Introduction to Special Issue: Islamic Revivalism and Social Transformation in the Modern World. Religions, 14(7), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14070899

Amir, A. M., & Syamsuddin, S. (2021). Tafsir Virtual: Karakteristik Penafsiran dalam Konten Dakwah Akhir Zaman di YouTube. Suhuf, 14(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.22548/shf.v14i1.614

Az-Zarnuji, B. A.-I. (1981). Ta’lim Al-Muta’allim Thariqu At-Ta’allum. Al-Maktab Al-Islami. Google

Burhan, & Asmiraty. (2022). Kampus Islam di Era Generasi Z. CV Azka Pustaka. Google

Chia, P. S., & Juanda. (2020). Understanding the Relationship Between Faith and Knowledge. Didaskalia, 3(1 April), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.33856/didaskalia.v3i1.152

Donati, P., & Archer, M. S. (2015). The Relational Subject. In The Relational Subject. Cambridge University Press (CUP). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316226780

Dyer, W. J., & Erickson, J. J. (2023). Mental health at religious and non-religious universities: Examining the role of student religiousness and sexual/gender minority identity. Journal of Affective Disorders, 342, 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2023.09.011

Faela Nisa, Y., Annisa Hendarmin, L., Affianty Lubis, D., Mubarok, M. Z., Agung, S., Narhetali, E., Rohayati, T., Maulana, D., Eka Saputra, R., Priyo Utomo, A., Ruswandi, B., & Kharisma Putra, D. (2018). Gen Z: Kegalauan Identitas Keagamaan (D. Syafruddin & I. Ropi (eds.); Issue 1). Pusat Pengkajian Islam dan Masyarakat (PPIM) UIN Jakarta. Google

Fanani, A. F. (2004). Islam Mazhab Kritis Menggagas Keberagamaan Liberatif. PT Kompas Media Nusantara. Google

Farchan, Y. (2020, July). Islam Virtual: Ekspresi Keagamaan Milenial Muslim Urban Indonesia. Www.Timesindonesia.Co.Id, 8. Google

Furlow A., C. (2016). Intersections of the Qur’an and Science in Contemporary Malaysia. In M. Daneshgar, P. Riddell G, & A. Rippin (Eds.), The Quran in the Malay-Indonesian World Context and Intepretation (p. 276). Routledge. Google

Ganzach, Y., Ellis, S., & Gotlibovski, C. (2013). On intelligence education and religious beliefs. Intelligence, 41(2), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.01.001

Gross, J. T. (2019). Polish Society Under German Occupation The Generalgouvernement, 1939-1944. Princenton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691196657

Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT press. Google

Hamzah, A. (2020). Metode Penelitian Studi Kasus Single Case, Instrumental Case, Multicase & Multisite (N. A. Rahma (ed.)). Literasi Nusantara. Google

Hasanuddin, & Nurman Ginting. (2021). Strengthening Religious Moderation Literacy For Muhammadiyah Citizens, In The Leaders Of The Muhammadiyah Branch, Medan City, North Sumatera Indonesia. International Journal Of Community Service, 1(3), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijcs.v1i3.49

Howell, J. D. (2008). Modulations of Active Piety: Professors and Televangelists as Promoters of Indonesian ‘Sufisme.’ In G. Fealy & S. White (Eds.), Expressing Islam: Religious Life and Politics in Indonesia (pp. 40–62). ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789812308528-007

Huda Ali, N. (2016). Gerakan Fundamentalisme Islam di Indonesia: Perspektif Sosio-Historis. Tamaddun Journal: Journal of Culture and Islamic Literature, 16(2), 14. Google

Huda, S. (2022). Dakwah digital Muhammadiyah Pola Baru Dakwah Era Disrupsi (M. M. Mas’udi (ed.)). Samudra Biru. Google

Ihsan, N. H. (2019). Omid Safi’s Concept of Progressive Muslims. Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Pemikiran Islam, 17(2), 203–222. Google

Inviolata, M., Ola, D., & Keban, Y. B. (2023). Tradisi Gemohing Lamaholot Sebagai Emblem Pemersatu Masyarakat Multikultural Di Desa Tuwagoetobi. Sosial Dan Budaya, 6(2), 2599–2473. https://doi.org/10.31538/almada.v6i2.3327

Irfani, F., Albantani, A. M., Suhendra, A., & Masnin, H. (2021). The Other Sides of Pesantren: Magical Practices Around Pesantren In Banten. Akademika : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 26(2), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.32332/akademika.v26i2.3694

Ismail, I. (2018). The True Da’wa Menggagas Paradigma Baru Dakwah Era Millenial. Kencana.

Iswanto, A. (2018). Membaca Kecenderungan Pemikiran Islam Generasi Milenial Indonesia. Harmoni, 17(1), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.32488/harmoni.v17i1.299

Kau, S. A. P. (2021). Argumen Islam Ramah Budaya. Inteligensia Media. Google

Khuzaimah, & Pribadi, F. (2022). Penerapan Demokrasi Pendidikan pada Pembelajaran Siswa di Sekolah Dasar. Al Ma’arif: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Dan Budaya, 4(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.35905/almaarief.v4i1.2176

Kreps., G. (2013). Applied Communication Theory and Research (D. O’Hair (ed.)). Routledge. Google

Laliwala, J. I. (2005). Islamic Philosophy of Religion Synthesis of Science Religion and Philosophy. Sarup & Sons. Google

Lampeter, G. R. B. (2005). Islam Virtual Menjelajah Islam di Jagad Maya. Suluh Press. Google

Lestari, L. (2015). Abraham Geiger dan Kajian Al-Quran Telaah Metodologi atas Buku Judaism and Islam. Suhuf, 7(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.22548/shf.v7i1.22

Lionardo, A., Nomaini, F., Bafadhal, O. M., Santoso, A. D., & Alfitri. (2024). What makes Indonesian government officials believe in and implement evidence-based policy: The mediating role of religion-science compatibility beliefs. Heliyon, 10(3), e24879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24879

Mauludi, S. (2018). Socrates Café Bijak, Kritis, & Inspiratif Seputar Dunia & Masyarakat Digital. PT Elex Media Komputindo. Google

Muary, R. (2022). Penguatan Moderasi Beragama Bagi Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) Kementerian Agama dan Tokoh Lintas Agama di Sumatera Utara. Pelita Masyarakat, 4(1), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.31289/pelitamasyarakat.v4i1.7748

Mughni, S. A. (2020). Tekstualias Neo Salafisme. Pwmujatim, 1. Google

Muhammad bin ‘Alī, A.-J. ‘Alī bin. (1405). Kitāb At-Ta’rīfāt. Dār Al-Kitāb Al-Arabi. Google

Muhammad, M., Al-Amini, I. K., Lestari, S. D., & Hidayah, A. N. (2023). Islam Berkemajuan Dan Islam Liberal : Sebuah Komparasi. Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, 1(6), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.59435/gjmi.v1i6.190

Mulyati, S. (2019). The Meaning of Jihad: Textual and Contextual Interpretations. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 27(1), 6. Google

Mustofa, A. (2008). Beragama Dengan Akal Sehat (O. R. Akbar (ed.)). Padma Press. Google

Nasir, M., & Rijal, M. K. (2021). Keeping the middle path: mainstreaming religious moderation through Islamic higher education institutions in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 11(2), 213–241. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v11i2.213-241

Nasr, S. H. (1994). Traditional Islam In The Modern World. Kegan Paul International. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004378063_013

Nata, A. (2011). Studi Islam Komprehensif (Fauzan (ed.)). Kencana. Google

Nguyen, H. H., & Tran, H. V. (2022). Digital Society and Society 5.0: Urgent Issues for Digital Social Transformation in Vietnam. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik, 35(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.V35I12022.78-92

Nur Aida, L. (2022). Relevansi Serat Wedhatama Karya K.G.P.A.A. Mangkunegara IV Pupuh Kinanthi Dalam Pendidikan Karakter Bagi Remaja Muslim Gen-Z. IAIN Kudus. Google

Nur Kusumo, A., & Kusmana. (2024). Intepretaion of Hanif in The Qur’an With a Late Antiquity and Near East Approach. Al Quds : Jurnal Studi Al-Quran Dan Hadis, 8(3), 541–554. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v8i3.9572

Nurdin, A. (2020). Teori Komunikasi Interpersonal Disertai Contoh Fenomena Praktis. Kencana. Google

Prakasita, A. W., & Marijan, K. (2021). Reviving Islam through online preaching: A study of collective piety formation by Surabaya Hijrah in Urban Middle-Class Millennial Community. Islamic Quarterly, 64(3), 359–384. Google

Pramudianto. (2020). Teacher as a Coach (Parents as a Coach). PT Elex Media Komputindo. Google

Pusposari, D. (2017). Pendidikan yang Demokratis dalam Era Global. Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia Dalam Konteks Global, 16. Google

Rahmawati, D. (2018). Millennials and I - Generation Life. Laksana. Google

Rifai, M. (2021). 5 Ustadz Muda yang Berdakwah Jangkau Generasi Milenial dan Gen-Z. Https://Langit7.Id/. Google

Riyanto, dkk, A. (2020). Berteologi Baru untuk Indonesia. Kanisius. Google

Romario. (2019). Generasi Z, Media Sosial, dan Pencarian Agama : Studi Terhadap Tigas Sekolah Menengah Atas di Yogyakarta. Pascasarjana UIN Sunan Kalijaga. Google

Sa’dah, S. L., Rofiah, K., Mun’im, A., Yusuf, S. M., & Chotib, M. (2023). Liberalism and Religious Moderation: The Dilemma in Indonesia. Wisdom, 26(2), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v26i2.1014

Sajjad Ahmad, A., & Latifah, I. (2021). Religious Moderation in Islamic Religious Practices Through Wasathiyah Concept. Sunan Kalijaga International Journal on Islamic Educational Research, 5(2), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.14421/skijier.2021.52.06

Shen, M., Purwono, U., & French, D. C. (2020). Romance, religion, and problem behavior in Indonesian Muslim adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 81, 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.04.001

Siregar, P. (2014). Integrasi Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Dalam Perspektif M. Amin Abdullah. MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 38(2), 20. https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v38i2.66

Srie Gunawan, L. A., & Maranatha Bangun, N. C. (2019). Diskursus Agama di Ruang Publik Jurgen Habermas. Logos: Jurnal Filsafat, 16(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.54367/logos.v16i2.1028

Sukmawan, S. (2014). Apokaliptisme Sastra Lisan Lereng Arjuna. Sirok Bastra, 2(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.37671/sb.v2i2.43

Syaibah Al-Hamdi, ’Abdu Al-Qadir. (2008). Al-Jami’ As-Shahih li Al-Bukhari Al-Juz’u Al-Awwal. Fahrasah Maktabah Al-Malik Fahd Al-Wathaniyyah Atsna’ An-Nasyr. Google

Ulfah, A. K., Razali, R., Rahman, H., Ghofur, A., & Bukhory, U. (2022). Ragam Analisis Data Penelitian (Sastra, Riset dan Pengembangan) (S. R. Wahyuningrum (ed.)). IAIN Madura Press. Google

Wahab, A. J. (2019). Islam Radikal dan Moderat Diskursus dan Kontestasi Varian Islam Indonesia. PT Elex Media Komputindo. Google

Waters, M., Ashenden, S., Connolly, P., South, N., Hunt, A., Schroeder, R., Kellner, D., Stein, A., & Osborne, T. (1997). Sociology After Postmodernism (D. Owen (ed.)). Sage Publication. Google

Winarni, L., & Permana, A. P. Y. N. (2022). Saudi Vision 2030 and the Challenge of Competitive Identity Transformation in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Islamic World and Politics, 6(1), 104–121. https://doi.org/10.18196/jiwp.v6i1.14579

Yani, M. T., & Hanafi, Y. (2022). Deradicalization through Revitalization of Religious and Nationality Insights among Indonesian Students. Edukasia Islamika, 7(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.28918/jei.v7i1.5209

Zulfis. (2019). Sains Dan Agama Dialog Epistemologi Nidhal Guessoum Dan Ken Wilber (M. Yusuf el-Badari (ed.)). Sakata Cendekia. Google

Downloads

Published

2025-07-09

How to Cite

Prabowo Adi Widayat, Cahaya Khaeroni, & Kuliyatun Kuliyatun. (2025). Religious Moderation Among Generation Z Indonesian Muslims: A Dialectical Analysis of Understanding and Practice. Fikri : Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial Dan Budaya, 10(1), 264–285. https://doi.org/10.25217/jf.v10i1.5726