The Creativity Level in Writing Mini Fiction Based on Ecopreneurship through Design Thinking in Online Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v8i2.2735Keywords:
Writing Mini Fiction, Entrepreneurship, Design ThinkingAbstract
The aim of this research is to determine the effect of the design thinking approach assisted by synchronous media Zoom and asynchronous media Google Classroom on writing skills for mini fiction based on ecopreneurship in terms of the creativity level (low, medium, and high). Method of research used was quasi-experimental method with 3 x 2 factorial design and involving 60 students from the Elementary School Teacher Education Study Program as samples in Universitas Islam 45 Kota Bekasi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, and Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja. The results of research prove that there is an interaction effect between learning using the design thinking approach assisted by synchronous media Zoom and asynchronous media GCR with levels of creativity together towards improving writing skills for mini fiction based on ecopreneurship with a sig. (0.004) < α (0.05). which has implications for increasing the quantity and quality of innovative learning approaches in elementary education
Keywords: Writing Mini Fiction, Entrepreneurship, Design Thinking
References
Afiani, A., Aryanto, S., & Gumala, Y. (2022). Implementation of Contextual Learning Models to Improve Poetry Writing Skills Based on Ecoliteracy at Elementary School. International Journal of Education, Language, and Religion, 4(2), 68. https://doi.org/10.35308/ijelr.v4i2.5624 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35308/ijelr.v4i2.5624
Aryanto, S., Hartati, T., Maftuh, B., & Darmawan, D. (2022). Ecoprenuership-Based Children's Literature as Financial Literacy Learning Content in Elementary Schools.. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 8(3), 722–737. https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v8i3.2569 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v8i3.2569
Aryanto, S., Nurkaeti, N., & Nuryadin, A. (2020). Anticipatory Efforts to Deal with Covid-19 in the Disruptive Era Through the Development of an Ecopreneurship-Based Poetry Anthology. 1(1), 61–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31599/jki.v1i1.270
Aryanto, S., Rahman, R., Hartati, T., Nurkaeti, N., Rony, Z. T., Suharjuddin, S., Lidinillah, D. A. M., & Junaidi, F. (2021). Internalization of Ecopreneurship Values through the Development of Poetry Anthology in Primary School. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-11-2020.2311764 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-11-2020.2311764
Aryanto, S., Rahman, R., Hartati, T., Sumirat, F., Karlina, D. A., & Trivena, T. (2021). Theoretical Study of Ecopreneurship-Based Fiksimini Development in Contextualizing the Characteristics of Elementary School Students. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v7i2.3141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v7i2.3141
Aryanto, S., Rony, Z. T., Jannah, W. N., Erlianda, M., Agustina, P. A., & Aziz, A. (2021). Assistance in Preparing the Fiksimini Anthology Based on Ecoprenuership for Prospective Elementary School Teachers. Education and Community Service Research proceedings 2021, 1(1), 659–669.
Aryanto, S., & Syaodih, E. (2017). Development of Ecopreneurship in Primary School. IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education, III(9), 597–602. https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.370428 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.370428
Aryanto, S., Widiansyah, A., & Markum, M. (2019). Creativity in Making Children's Literature Based on Ecopreneurship. Indonesian Journal of Primary Education, 3(2), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijpe.v3i2.21677 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijpe.v3i2.21677
Aryanto, S., Widiansyah, A., & Markum, M. (2020). Increasing Creative Thinking Abilities in Making Ecopreneurship-Based Children's Literature Through the Implementation of Design Thinking. Educational Journal of Bhayangkara, 1(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.31599/edukarya.v1i1.107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31599/edukarya.v1i1.107
Aslan, A., & Shiong, P. K. (2023). Learning in the Digital Age Full of Hedonistic Cultural Values Among Elementary School Students. Bulletin of Pedagogical Research, 3(2), 94-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.51278/bpr.v3i2.515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51278/bpr.v3i2.515
Bela, N., Jannah, S. R., & Jaenullah, J. (2022). An Analysis of Book T'alimul Muta'alim on Education Character and It’s Relationship with Education Character Programs at Indonesia. Bulletin of Pedagogical Research, 3(1), 10-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.51278/bpr.v3i1.213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51278/bpr.v3i1.213
Budiarti, W. N. (2019). Increasing Motivation for Learning Indonesian Elementary School Using Google Classroom. DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik, 3(2), 257. https://doi.org/10.20961/jdc.v3i2.35191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jdc.v3i2.35191
Chu, S. L., Deuermeyer, E., & Quek, F. (2018). Supporting scientific modeling through curriculum-based making in elementary school science classes. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 16, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.09.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.09.002
Cross, N. (2023). Design thinking: What just happened? Design Studies, 86, 101187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2023.101187 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2023.101187
Cuaca Dharma, H. R., Asmarani, D., & Dewi, U. P. (2017). Basic Japanese Grammar and Conversation e-learning through Skype and Zoom Online Application. Procedia Computer Science, 116, 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.10.055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.10.055
Darmawan, D., Hartati, T., & Mulyasari, E. (2013). Video Streaming for Creative Writing at International Elementary School. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 7(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v7i1.175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v7i1.175
Far-Far, G. (2021). Effectiveness of Using the Zoom Meeting Application in Learning. ISTORIA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sejarah, 17(1), 1–5.
Fauzi, I., Chano, J., Komariah, M., Fhilrizki, S. I., & Salim, H. (2023). Paper Airplane Toys: Interpreting Children’s Thinking. Jurnal Iqra': Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(1), 224-242. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v8i1.3198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v8i1.3198
Georgiev, G. V., & Georgiev, D. D. (2023). Quantitative dynamics of design thinking and creativity perspectives in company context. Technology in Society, 74(May), 102292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102292 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102292
Graham, M. J., & Borgen, J. (2018). Google Classroom. Google Tools Meets Middle School, 3, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506360188.n3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506360188.n3
Haqien, D., & Rahman, A. A. (2020). Utilization of Zoom Meetings for the Learning Process during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Educational Article Arrangement, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v5i1.6511 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v5i1.6511
Harjanto, A. S., & Sumarni, S. (2019). Teachers’ Experiences on the Use of Google Classroom. English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) , 3(1), 172–178.
Hilal, T. A., Hilal, A. A., & Hilal, H. A. (2022). Social Networking Applications: A Comparative Analysis for a Collaborative Learning through Google Classroom and Zoom. Procedia Computer Science, 210(C), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.10.120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.10.120
Irmada, F., & Yatri, I. (2021). Effectiveness of Online Learning Through Zoom Meetings during the Pandemic for Students. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(4), 2423–2429. https://jbasic.org/index.php/basicedu/article/view/1245 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i4.1245
Islam, M. J., Datta, R., & Iqbal, A. (2023). Actual rating calculation of the zoom cloud meetings app using user reviews on google play store with sentiment annotation of BERT and hybridization of RNN and LSTM. Expert Systems with Applications, 223(March), 119919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119919 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119919
Izenstark, A., & Leahy, K. L. (2015). Google classroom for librarians: features and opportunities. Library Hi Tech News, 32(9), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-05-2015-0039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-05-2015-0039
Kangas, K. (2013). Design Thinking in Elementary Students’ Collaborative Lamp Designing Process. Design and Technology Education, 18(1), 30–43.
Ketut Sudarsana, I., Bagus Made Anggara Putra, I., Nyoman Temon Astawa, I., & Wayan Lali Yogantara, I. (2019). The use of Google classroom in the learning process. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1175(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012165
Khumairo, A., & Anggriliana, P. (2022). An Assistance of Building Children Character through Social Education Poster at Karyamukti Village. Bulletin of Community Engagement, 2(2), 60-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.51278/bce.v2i2.293 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51278/bce.v2i2.293
Lestari, F., Efendi, D., & Dara, T. (2023). Video Online Learning: An Alternative for Students' Mathematics Problem Solving. Bulletin of Science Education, 3(3), 171-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.51278/bse.v3i3.807 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51278/bse.v3i3.807
Li, Z., Zhou, M., & Lam, K. K. L. (2022). Dance in Zoom: Using video conferencing tools to develop students’ 4C skills and self-efficacy during COVID-19. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46(July), 101102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101102
Liu, H. Y. (2023). Design thinking competence as self-perceived by nursing students in Taiwan: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Education Today, 121(July 2022), 105696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105696 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105696
Mohd Shaharanee, I., Mohd Jamil, J., & Mohamad Rodzi, S. (2016). The Application of Google Classroom as a Tool for Teaching and Learning. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 8(10), 5–8. https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/20521/1/JTEC 8 10 2016 5 8.pdf
Mubin, M. N., Fauzi, M. S., Al Hadisi, A. S., Bayhaqi, A., & Rosyada, M. F. (2022). Implementation and Problematic of Blended Learning in Fiqh Learning: A Combination of Synchronous and Asynchronous in Online Learning. Jurnal Iqra’ : Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(1), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v7i1.1883 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v7i1.1883
Nacu, C. M., & Avasilcăi, S. (2014). Technological Ecopreneurship: Conceptual Approaches. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.481 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.481
Nurkaeti, N., Turmudi, Karso, Pratiwi, V., Aryanto, S., & Gumala, Y. (2020). Enhancement of mathematical creative thinking ability through open-ended approach based on metacognitive. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032030
Rostiani, Y., Setiyani, L., & Octaviani, T. (2023). The Effectiveness of Using the Zoom Application as an Online Learning Media for Post-Pandemic Karawang Campus Students. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 3(2), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.35877/454ri.eduline1781 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline1781
Schaltegger, S. (2002). A Framework for Ecopreneurship. 45–58.
Schaltegger, S. (2014). A Framework for Ecopreneurship. Greener Management International, 2002(38), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.3062.2002.su.00006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.3062.2002.su.00006
Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Innovation: Categories and Interactions. 237(July 2010), 222–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.682
Schaper, M. (2002a). The essence of ecopreneurship. Greener Management International, 38, 26–30. https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.3062.2002.su.00004
Schaper, M. (2002b). The Essence of Ecopreneurship *. 26–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.3062.2002.su.00004
Shalsabila, E. T., Putri, E. W., Hosen, H. H., Hasibuan, A. T., & Pebriani, L. V. (2018). Time Pressure Increases Component Fluency of Creativity. 139(Uipsur 2017), 265–270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/uipsur-17.2018.39
Supriatna, N. (2016). Local Wisdom in Constructing Students ’ Ecoliteracy Through Ethnopedagogy and Ecopedagogy. 126–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/icse-15.2016.28
Suyanto, S. (2023). Impact of Innovative Learning in Mathematics and Natural Sciences on Student Learning Achievements: A Meta-Analysis. Jurnal Iqra': Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(1), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v8i1.3007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v8i1.3007
Suryanti, Widodo, W., & Budijastuti, W. (2020). Guided discovery problem-posing: An attempt to improve science process skills in elementary school. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1336a DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1336a
Tosto, S. A., Alyahya, J., Espinoza, V., McCarthy, K., & Tcherni-Buzzeo, M. (2023). Online learning in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic: Mixed methods analysis of student views by demographic group. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100598 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100598
Tsai, C., Song, M. W., Lo, Y., & Lo, C. (2023). Design thinking with constructivist learning increases the learning motivation and wicked problem-solving capability — An empirical research in Taiwan. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 50(August 2022), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101385 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101385
Wrigley, C., Mosely, G., & Tomitsch, M. (2018). Design Thinking Education : A Comparison of Massive Open Online Courses. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 4(3), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2018.06.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2018.06.002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sani Aryanto, Tatat Hartati, Bunyamin Maftuh, Deni Darmawan, Juppri Bacotang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
