The Implementation of Dwangsom in the Execution of Hadhanah Matters and its Relationship to the Ultra Petita Basis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25217/jm.v8i2.3648Keywords:
Child Protection; Criminalization; Street CrimeAbstract
This article aims to examine the reasons why dwangsom is urgent in hadhanah cases and how it is implemented in hadhanah execution cases and its relationship with the ultra petita principle. This article is empirical normative legal research with qualitative descriptive analysis method. The urgency of dwangsom in hadhanah cases is an effort to provide psychological pressure so that the defendant wants to carry out the judge's order voluntarily, namely handing over the child who is the object of the case. If the defendant does not hand over the child as the judge's decision, then the defendant must pay dwangsom. The institution of dwangsom is not widely known to the public, but dwangsom is an appropriate and effective solution because the surrender of children cannot be done through forced execution. Dwangsom can be implemented in hadhanah cases if the plaintiff submits a dwangsom application. The petition must also explain the chronology of the plaintiff's reasons for requesting dowry. If dowry is not submitted in the petita, then the judge is not authorized to decide dowry, because granting dowry without a request from the plaintiff is an ultra petita action.
References
Abdul Manan. (2005). Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama. Kencana.
Alfiah, M. A. dan E. (2018). Urgensi Dwangsom dalam Eksekusi Hadhanah. Kencana.
Alfitri. (2020). Protecting Women from Domestic Violence: Islam, Family Law, and the State in Indonesia. Studia Islamika, A27(2), 273–307. https://doi.org/10.36712/sdi.v27i2.9408
Asni, A. (2021). Putusan Serta Merta dalam Perkara Hadhanah di Pengadilan Agama dalam Rangka Perlindungan Anak. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 15(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v15i1.4115
Aziz, A. H. dan S. (2018). Urgensi Penerapan Lembaga Dwangsom pada Perkara Hadhanah di Pengadilan Agama dalam Perspektif Maqashid al-Syari’ah. Jurnal Al Adalah Fakultas Syari’ah UIN Raden Intan Lampung, 15.
Bisri, dikutip dalam C. (2012). Rumusan HAsil Diskusi Kelompok Bidang Peradilan Agma (Komisi II), Manado Tanggal 31 Oktober.
Braver, S. L., Ellman, I. M., Votruba, A., & Fabricius, W. V. (2011). Lay Judgments About Child Custody After Divorce. SSRN Electronic Journal, November. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1435043
Hakim Asrori. (2022). Wawancara Hakim Asrori Pengadilan Agama.
Hakim Nurkholis, H. P. A. T. (2020). Wawancara Hakim Nurkholis.
Harahap, Y. (2005). Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata. Sinar Grafika.
Manan, A. (2005). Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama. Kencana.
Mas’ud, M., Suhar, S., & Harun, H. (2023). Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Agama tentang Penerapan Dwangsom dan Uitvoerbaar Bij Voorraad dalam Perkara Hadhanah. Journal of Comprehensive Islamic Studies, 2(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.56436/jocis.v2i1.173
Muhammad, A. (2008). Hukum Acara Perdata. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Mukti Arto, E. A. (2018). Urgensi Dwangsom dalam Eksekusi Hadhanah. Kencana.
Mulyadi, L. (2012). Tuntutan Profisional dan Uang Paksa (Dwangsom) dalam Hukum Acara Perdata. Alumni.
Musawwamah, S. (2020). The implementation of perma number 3 of 2017 concerning the guidelines for dealing with women’s cases on laws as an effort of women empowerment in the judiciary in madura. Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial, 15(1), 67–92. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v15i1.2883
Nasution, A., & Nasution, I. F. A. (2021). Customary Law Approaches to Ḥaḍānah Disputes in Aceh: Arguments and Social Implications. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 21(2), 257–278.
Nasution, A., Pagar, & Asmuni. (2022). The Disparity of Judge’s Verdict on Child Custody Decision in Aceh Sharia Co. Samarah, 6(2), 890–913. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i2.12758
Nasution, K., & Nasution, S. (2021). Implementation of Indonesian Islamic Family Law To Guarantee Children’S Rights. Al-Jami’ah, 59(2), 347–374. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2021.592.347-374
Rafiq, A. (2013). Hukum Perdata Islam di Indonesia,. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Seprilyadi. (2019). Interviuew dengan Hakim PA Tulang Bawang Barat.
Siallagan, H. (2010). Masalah Putusan Ultra Petita Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang. Mimbar Hukum, XXII.
Tumpa, H. (2010). Memahami Eksisitensi Uang Paksa (Dwangsom) dan Implementasinya di Indonesia. In I. Prenada Media Group.
Yarsa, I. W. (n.d.). Kepastian hukum putusan hakim dalam penyelesaian sengketa perkara perdata. Jurnal Rechtens, 12(1), 33–48.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Linda Firdawaty, Siti Mahmudah, Rozana Isa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the Jurnal Mahkamah : Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in Jurnal Mahkamah : Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Mahkamah : Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
