Stages of Prosecution of Crimes with Aggravation Analysis of Religious Court Decisions

Authors

  • Muhammad Aldi Universitas Labuhanbatu, Indonesia
  • Abdul Hakim Universitas Labuhanbatu, Indonesia
  • Maya Jannah Universitas Labuhanbatu, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25217/jm.v9i1.4674

Keywords:

Judge's Decision, Legal Considerations, Theft with Aggravation

Abstract

The state guarantees the lives of its citizens in accordance with Article 28A of the 1945 Constitution. The Criminal Code covers specific crimes including crimes against property in Book Two Chapter XXII, namely Theft.  The purpose of this study is to analyse the prosecutor's charges in a case of aggravated theft. The method used in this research is normative research. This type of research uses descriptive qualitative type. The data sources used are two types of primary data sources in the form of case file Number: 814/pid.B/2023/PN.Rap and criminal law books and secondary data sources in the form of books and articles related to this research. The results of this study are the unbalanced prosecutor's charges between the two perpetrators of theft with aggravation. This research concludes that the legal considerations in the judge's decision which sentenced each of the two defendants to 1 year (defendant 1) and 9 months (second defendant). This research is strengthened by the existence of case files located at the Labuhanbatu police station, so that it can be properly analysed.

References

Hamzah, A. Delik-Delik Tertentu (Special Deliction) Di Dalam KUHP. Medan: Sinar Grafika, 2009.

Hasibuan, R. Asas-Asas KriminologiAsas-Asas Kriminologi. Medan: USU Press, 2009

Muhammad, R. Potret Lembaga Indonesia. Medan: PT. RajaGrafindo, 2013

Magrhobi, B. D. “Tinjauan Kriminologis Faktor Penyebab Terjadinya Tindak Pidana Pencurian Kendaraan Bermotor.” Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Brawijaya, Malang, 2014.

Pradhana, A. P., Chairani, M. A., Iswati, R., & Praptanto, D. “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pertimbangan Hakim Dan Putusan Hakim Perkara No 75/Pid.B/2021/Pn.Mad Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencurian ( Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Negeri Madiun ).” Jurnal Imiah Hukum 8, no. 2 (2021): 81–96

Sutarto. “Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Nomor 404/PID/2015/PT. MDN Tentang Tindak Pidana Pencurian Ringan.” Jurnal Hukum 12, no. 2 (2020): 334–357

Waruru. “ANALISIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM PERKARA PENCURIAN YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH ANAK (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor : 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2019/PN Trg).” JURNAL RECTUM 3, no. 2 (2021): 447–459.

Muis, Abd. “ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM TINDAK PIDANA (Putusan Nomor: 01/ Pid. B/ 2012/ PN.DPS) (JURIDICAL ANLYSYS THE VERDICT DESICION AT ROBBING CRIMINAL(Verdict Number : 01/ Pid. B/ 2012/ PN.DPS) ).” Artikel Hasil Penelitian Mahasiswa 1, no. 1 (2013).

Direktori, Agung, M., Indonesia, R., & Sunggal, K. M. “Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia,” 15:1–33, 2023.

Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Daerah Sumatera Utara Resor Labuhanbatu. “Berkas Perkara.” Rantauprapat, 2023.

Pengadilan Negeri Rantauprapat Kelas I-B. “Surat Putusan Pidana 814/Pid. B/2023/PN. Rap.” Rantauprapat, 2023.

Riyananda, F. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Hakim Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Pencurian (Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Negeri Semarang).” Unissula, 2021.

UU pasal 1 Kapolri no.14 (2012).

UUD 1945. Pasal 1 ayat 1 nomor 16 (2004).

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Aldi, M., Hakim, A., & Jannah, M. (2024). Stages of Prosecution of Crimes with Aggravation Analysis of Religious Court Decisions. Jurnal Mahkamah : Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam, 9(1), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.25217/jm.v9i1.4674

Issue

Section

Articles